One more Reason why I prefer Film

I was out and about with my Leica IIIa with a never before tried film emulsion, Kodak Tmax 400. Heard saying that it was nice stuff with finer grain than my ‘normal’ HP5 or Tri-X and I wanted to test it out.170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (2)

For the first 20 frames I had my super sharp Industar 50 lens on the camera. It’s by far the sharpest lens I have for my IIIa and would be perfect but for those flares…. It’s a coated version but it flares in direct sunlight.

The rest of the roll was shot with the Leitz Summitar, a notably softer lens. No, Leica did not always produce that extremely sharp glass. The rendering is definitely ‘retro’, with a slightly swirly bokeh… if I have to use that word – really don’t like it. Let’s call it ‘out of focus rendering’. It’s longer but I prefer.170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (29)

So where was I? Ah yes, the Summitar…. freshly cleaned, not much traces on the lens elements apart from a small scratch but nonetheless this nice vintage, soft look.

So all is well, none of my thread mount lenses are perfect, far from it, but all have a lot of character.

But let’s get back to the film. After scanning the negatives I was happy to see much less grain than on HP5! Of course, HP5 developed in Rodinal is reputed for huge grain, but the same developer produces much better results with Tmax.170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (15)

Now what I still don’t know is how far Tmax can be pushed. If anyone has some information about that, please let me hear it!

By the way, I worked on the scans in MacPhun’s Luminar, a really great editor that I like a lot. It’s really very easy to use, even by me. And the user interface is adaptable, with tools you can assemble to your taste and needs. And it supports layers, unlike Lightroom.

And of course, Luminar does not come with a life sentence of monthly payments. It’s a one-shot buy with nice free updates. The only thing that’s still missing is a cataloguing function, but that’s in the works for a future update!170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (1)

And it works really nice as an external editor for Apple’s Photos which is a good point for me. Lightroom is a bit too heavy for me. I really struggle to wrap my old brain around it’s functions and possibilities. By the way, a PC version of Luminar is in beta-testing right now, to be released real soon!

And as a film shooter, I love Luminar’s spotting and cloning functions (eraser) that works in my eyes much better than Lightroom’s version. Lightroom sometimes struggles to clone the correct spot, leaving nasty traces while Luminar corrects any dusty or hairy residue near flawlessly… if a bit slower.

But enough of that technical stuff!

Here’s the essence of this post: Another reason for me to love film!170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (13)

When I scan my negatives (still no permanent darkroom possible to wet-print and too much hassle to occupy the bathroom…), when I see them appear on screen, when I take a first look, there’s a bond that is created with that photo. A bond that existed already when I shot it. It’s now reinforced. I look at the photo and I see the possibilities, I see it just as I imagined it the moment I shot it.170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (6)

After, when I work on it in Luminar or Lightroom, I have a real relation to the photo. A relation that is simply missing for me with digital files from an SD card.

And as I like the ‘imperfect’ film look, I have to work much longer on each digital frame to get it to look the way I want. Film has my preferred look built in. Some quick jabs at contrast, light and black sliders and I’m mostly done. Well, there’s the spotting, but I’m working on keeping my negatives dust free….170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (17)

This is my opinion, just my feeling, and you might well think different. It’s just a fact that for me film holds much more emotions than digital.

Or is it my age? 😉170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (12)

Ah yes, back to Tmax…. for cheapskates like me, there’s a nice twist to this emulsion. Apparently the Lomography Earl Grey film is rebranded Tmax 100 and Lady Grey is rebranded Tmax 400….. and they are CHEAPER than the real ones! Bundled in 3-roll-packs you can save some dollars, euros or other on film by going to lomography.

All in all, I like that emulsion and I will certainly use it extensively in the next weeks and months. Play with it, find it’s limits…170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (32)

As I see it, Tmax gives my a lot of what I like right out of the box. Nice contrast, rather finer grain than HP5 and a look I just like!

Try it out!170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (4)

170628 - Leica IIIa - Kodak Tmax 400 (34)

Thanks for passing by!

17 thoughts on “One more Reason why I prefer Film

Add yours

    1. For the moment I use mostly Lightroom but I’m working on the switch to Luminar. I use Luminar as an Extension in Apple Photos with the External Editors for Photos app which allows to attach most applications to be used from inside Photos. So this works for the moment with Photos as cataloguing software and Luminar as editor. But I also edit the scans with Lightroom, just to get a feeling of the strengths and bad points of both.

      For the moment, Luminar shown very promising results though I’ll still need some tome to really get to grips with it (something I never achieved with Lightroom).

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Having spent the last couple of hours scanning a film, the only bonding I have been doing is with the chair I am sitting on. My love of film has also been decreasing by the minute – even if I do prefer it for taking portraits.

    There has never been a reason for having a life sentence with Lightroom – Capture One being one of the commercial alternatives. Also there is Rawtherapee. It is free and open source. Its user interface is not exactly easy to get on with but the results are certainly impressive.

    I do like your pictures. However, it would be interesting to see you using FP4 or even PANF Plus, too.
    Even if I dimly remember Luxembourg from over thirty years ago, it would be nice to see you taking the plunge and running a couple of colour films through your camera. 😉


  2. Haha, Dave, I like the ‘bonding with my chair’ part! Great!

    And as if the gods of light listened to you, I have currently an FP4 in my AE-1 and I just received a handful of Fuji color film, so new impressions from Luxembourg soon!


  3. I had accidentally picked up some tmax when I went to get tri-x (I bet I’m not the only film noob who has done this) and quite liked the results. These are great. And thanks for the lomography trip! I wonder if any of their other films are simply rebranded?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Gudde MĂ«tteg HĂ€r Lehnen,

    Bei (einfach um Google Datenblatt Kodak t-max 400 agin, da kann een e pdf bei uklicken an eroflueden) kann een di offiziell DatenblÀtter vu Kodak eroflueden, am Datenblatt vum T-Max 400 steht dass de Film kann bis 3200 ISO gepusht ginn, mat enger 3-Blendenstufen-Pushentwicklung.

    Ech kucken mĂ©i oder wĂ©ineger regelmĂ€sseg op Äer SĂ€it, an fannen se emmer mĂ©i intressant!
    Ech hun iwregens di lĂ€scht Woch an enger kuerzer Vakanz vu 4 Deeg mol rem meng aal Minolta-SLR “reaktivĂ©iert” an e Film dragemeet! (E Fuji Superia 200, 2014 ofgelaaf, den ech am Frigo gelagert hat, si gespant op d’Resultat :-))
    Ech fille mech emmer erem méi zum Film higezunn, an hunn virun 2 Wochen mol e Film a menger Olympus XA fÀrdeggemeet, deen lo 3 Joer an der Kamera am Schaaf vergeess gouf!

    Di nÀchst Vakanz am September geht et an Andalusien, do wart och erem eng analog Kamera derbÀisin, weeing wees ech nach nit, ech hun der nach genuch ;-)!

    Schéin analog Gréiss a bis geschwënn,


    Liked by 1 person

    1. Merci fir den Tip mat Blende7! A merci och fir dei leif Wieder iwwert mein Blog!

      Hun ech dei lÀscht Deeg e bessen rar gemaach, privat e Koup op der Schëpp!

      Ech hun dee bĂ«llegen Superia 200 ganz gĂ€r och wann e mengt dass gring am Fong e bessen blo misst sin… awer a ganz flotte Film. Schein Vakanz!!


      1. GĂ€rgeschitt mam Tip, ech sin och frou wann een mir weiderhĂ«lleft wann ech eng Fro hun oder nit mĂ©i weiderwees…ech hat dee Superia nach Rescht vun dĂ€r lĂ€schter HochzĂ€itsreportage dĂ©i ech gemeet hat, soss hun ech fir mech selwer bal nĂ«mmen Diafilmer geholl, am lĂ©ifsten den Fuji Velvia 50, mee den ass jo haut sou exorbitant deier ginn dass et keng Freed mĂ©i mĂ«cht…

        Ech perséinlech hat seinerzeit de Konica Colornegativfilm am léifsten, den hat wonnerschéin natirlech Farwen déi och nit an de kriteschen Faarwen wi rout oder blo iwersÀttegt huet.

        Wat Äer Internetsait ugeht, maacht eech domadder wanechgelifft nit zevill Stress fir eppes ze posten, et muss een am Liewen PrioritĂ©iten setzen, a wann am Privatliewen de Koup vun der SchĂ«pp ass, huet een och erem d’HĂ€nn an de Kapp frĂ€i fir seng Passioun :-)!

        Merci fir di schéin Vakanz, mee et ass jo nach bis dohin, ech wart mol heinsdo nach eraluussen :-).

        (p.S.: Ech hun och nach T-max an Tri-x am TiefkĂŒhler leien ;-))

        Bis geschwënn a bescht Filmgréiss,

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Merci a nach vill schei Foto’en!!

        Ech perseinlĂ«ch war emmer mat Kodachrome Ă«nnerwee, norlamerweis den 64. Daat waren Zeiten……


  5. I did use T-Max 400 in a Canon T-90, with spot metering. I pushed it to 800 on occasion, but when I knew there would be no light to speak of, I bought the 3200 speed roll instead. It had acceptable grain, as long as you didn’t mind it being visible. The 100 ISO was great in good light, very smooth.
    My main go-to for film back then was Ilford XP-2 though, as it could be processed in the high street.
    Best wishes, Pete.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: